Overview
Focusing on quality companies in an uncertain world
What does the Trust do?
STS Global Income & Growth Trust aims to be the high quality, low volatility global income and growth investment trust.
Why this Trust?
The Trust aims to meet the needs of investors looking for a growing level of income and steady capital growth over the long term, whilst also wanting to preserve the value of their money.
Trust Ratings
© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Literature
Document name | Date | Open/download | All documents |
---|---|---|---|
Factsheets | All documents | ||
Newsletters | All documents | ||
Annual Reports | All documents | ||
Interim Reports | All documents | ||
Key Information Document – UK |
View document Download document | ||
Key Information Document – EU |
View document Download document | ||
SDR Consumer-facing Disclosure |
View document Download document | ||
Proposed amendments to the articles of association |
View document Download document | ||
Circular |
View document Download document | ||
Past Performance scenarios |
View document Download document | ||
10 year Performance Chart |
View document Download document | ||
Investor Disclosure Document |
View document Download document |
-
Factsheets
Date: August 2025 View All documents OpenDownload
-
Newsletters
Date: Income Matters No.6 View All documents OpenDownload
-
Annual Reports
Date: 2025 View All documents OpenDownload
-
Interim Reports
Date: 2024 View All documents OpenDownload
- Open Download
- Open Download
- Open Download
- Open Download
- Open Download
- Open Download
- Open Download
- Open Download
Performance
Discrete Calendar Annual Returns (%) | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | YTD 2025 | Ann Return * |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STS Global Income & Growth Trust PLC | -5.4 | +35.8 | +6.8 | -7.9 | +39.3 | +0.9 | +16.3 | +1.0 | -0.7 | +9.7 | +9.9 | +7.7 |
Lipper Global Equity Global Income | -0.4 | +25.9 | +8.2 | -6.2 | +16.8 | +3.1 | +15.4 | +0.4 | +7.1 | +9.2 | +7.0 | +8.6 |
*Since Launch 31 July 2005. Source: Lipper, 31 August 2025. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of the Trust, and any income from it, may go down as well as up and investors may get back less than they invested. Returns may increase or decrease as a result of currency fluctuations. This data is provided for information only and should not be reproduced, published or disseminated in any manner. Although we consider the data to be reliable, no warranty is given as to its accuracy or completeness. Any comparisons against indices are for illustrative purposes only. To see the past performance of Troy’s Global Income Strategy please click here and navigate to the performance section of the page.
Risk analysis
Risk Analysis | STS Global Income & Growth Trust PLC | Lipper Global Equity Global Income |
---|---|---|
Total Return | 161.0 | 127.4 |
Max Drawdown | -34.3 | -25.3 |
Best Month | 12.2 | 9.7 |
Worst Month | -10.1 | -12.7 |
Positive Months | 61.7 | 64.2 |
Annualised Volatility | 12.9 | 10.2 |
Past performance is not a guide to future performance. Maximum Drawdown measures the worst investment period. Annualised Volatility is measured by standard deviation of annual returns. The value of the Trust, and any income from it, may go down as well as up and investors may get back less than they invested. Returns may increase or decrease as a result of currency fluctuations. This data is provided for information only and should not be reproduced, published or disseminated in any manner. Although we consider the data to be reliable, no warranty is given as to its accuracy or completeness. Any comparisons against indices are for illustrative purposes only. Source: Lipper, 31 August 2015 to 31 August 2025.
Dividends
Past performance is not a guide to future performance. Income generated (if any) may fall as well as rise.
Discount control
STS Global Income & Growth Trust implemented a Discount Control Mechanism on the 17th November 2020.
This discount control policy is to ensure that the Ordinary shares trade at, or close to, net asset value at all times. The discount control mechanism also serves to materially enhance the liquidity of the Company’s shares. This is ensured through a combination of share buy-backs at a modest discount NAV when supply exceeds demand for the Company’s shares and the issue of new Ordinary shares at a premium to net asset value where demand exceeds supply. The Directors will continue to seek the renewal of the Company’s authority to buy back Ordinary shares annually and at other times should this prove necessary. Purchases of Ordinary shares will only be made through the market for cash at prices below the prevailing net asset value of the Ordinary share. The Directors will be authorised to cancel any Ordinary shares purchased under such authority or to hold them in Treasury. The Directors will continue to seek the renewal of the Company’s authority to issue shares but will only do so when they believe it is advantageous to the Company’s shareholders and for the purposes of operating the Company’s discount policy. In no circumstances would such issue of new shares result in a dilution of the net asset value per share.
Trust announcements
Sustainable Investment Labels Statement
Sustainable investment labels help investors find products that have a specific sustainability goal. This trust does not have a UK sustainable investment label as it does not have a sustainable objective as part of its investment objective. Despite not having a sustainable investment objective, when investing in companies, Troy integrates the analysis of sustainability characteristics into its investment decision-making.
Important Information
Performance data provided relating to the NAV is calculated net of fees with income reinvested unless stated otherwise. Overseas investments may be affected by movements in currency exchange rates. The value of an investment and any income from it may fall as well as rise and investors may get back less than they invested. The historic yield reflects distributions declared over the past twelve months as a percentage of the Trust’s price, as at the date shown. It does not include any preliminary charge and investors may be subject to tax on their distributions. Tax legislation and the levels of relief from taxation can change at any time. Any change in the tax status of a Trust or in tax legislation could affect the value of the investments held by the Trust or its ability to provide returns to its investors. The yield is not guaranteed and will fluctuate. There is no guarantee that the objective of the investments will be met. Investment trusts may borrow money in order to make further investments. This is known as “gearing”. The effect of gearing can enhance returns to shareholders in rising markets but will have the opposite effect on returns in falling markets. Shares in an Investment Trust are listed on the London Stock Exchange and their price is affected by supply and demand. This means that the share price may be different from the NAV.
For the full trust disclaimer please refer to the Trust fact sheet.
How to invest
Find more information on how to invest in this trust and where it is available.
How to invest
Commentary
August 2025
The Trust produced a Net Asset Value total return of +0.6% during the month and a price total return of +0.0%, compared to a return of +0.6% for the Lipper Global – Equity Global Income Index.
Fund Managers, who by allocating capital in global markets are at the vanguard of the capitalist system (or so we would like to think) do not often quote Lenin. There is however one phrase that resonates today; “there are decades when nothing happens, and weeks where decades happen”.
Many years ago, we learnt about Butskellism – a portmanteau of Conservative Chancellor Rab Butler and his Labour predecessor Hugh Gaitskell. It described a settled post-war political consensus in the UK in favour of a significant welfare state, Keynesian economic management[1] and the pursuit of full employment. This consensus was disrupted by the Thatcher and Reagan administrations in the 1980s and 1990s, before the steady increase in taxation and the size of Government resumed its upward trajectory following the first few years of the Blair government which, after initially showing some fiscal constraint, began to spend in earnest.
After the brief Cameron/Osborne “austerity” interlude governments of all political stripes went back to business-as-usual culminating in the splurge needed to offset the effects of COVID and lockdown. To the pre-Thatcherite consensus was added, a further agreed wisdom, that in a safer world, protected by the US, defence spending could be safely downgraded to free up money to be spent on more societally beneficial areas such as health and social care.
The result has been an inexorable rise in levels of government debt to GDP across the developed world. So much so obvious. While this could be funded with low interest rates, the great ship of state could sail on without hard choices about spending and taxation having to be made. But recently this has changed.
As many of these trends (inflation, globalisation, security, US dominance) reverse, the consensus on which this spending was based is looking dangerously complacent and budgets worryingly stretched.
The yield on the UK 30-year Gilt as at the end of August was 5.64% and rising having been under 1% as recently as 2021. This rapid uplift in yields created some market disruption in 2022 but has been largely ignored since the launch of ChatGPT in November of that year. But it cannot be ignored forever. This rise in borrowing costs in the context of unsustainable debt loads is being echoed by similar moves around the world notably in the US, France and Japan. After many years of QE[2]-numbed bond markets, debt investors are finally becoming concerned about developed world debts and deficits. Could it be that we are witnessing the end of the cheery debt-based consensus and that the decades of “nothing happening” could be upended?
The timing of such a seismic event is impossible to predict and has been expected many times before. But if the bond markets are finally saying “enough”, then the economic, political and investment implications will be profound.
[1] Keynesian economic management is a counter-cyclical government approach, advocating for increased fiscal policy (spending and taxes) to stimulate aggregate demand during economic downturns
[2] Quantitative easing